FW: allow read into untouched noreserve mappings

Dave Korn dave.korn@artimi.com
Thu Jul 20 16:54:00 GMT 2006


On 19 July 2006 17:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Jul 19 17:49, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 19 July 2006 17:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> 
>>> shouldn't be as intransparent
>> 
>>   "opaque"  :)  JFYI!
> 
> It was on the tip of my tongue... er..., no, restart.
> 
> I had it in my fingertip but it just didn't came out.  And I was too
> lazy to look in to the dictionary, given the heat and all.
> 
> And then again, intransparent is as valid as opaque and it's also in
> the dictionary.

  Well, yes, of course, everyone knows that nonintransparent == unopaque ....
;)

> MAY A THOUSAND HIPPOS FALL ON YOU FOR HAVING ME LOOKING INTO THE
> DICTIONARY NOW!

  I couldn't possibly imagine a better way to get the weekend off to a
falling^W flying start!


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list