Cygwin multithreading performance
Mark Geisert
mark@maxrnd.com
Sat Dec 5 22:40:00 GMT 2015
Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> 2015-12-05 11:51 GMT+01:00 Mark Geisert <mark@maxrnd.com>:
>> Mark Geisert wrote:
>> In the OP's very good testcase the most heavily contended locks, by far, are
>> those internal to git's builtin/pack-objects.c. I plan to show actual stats
>> after some more cleanup, but I did notice something in that git source file
>> that might explain the difference between Cygwin and MinGW when running this
>> testcase...
>>
>> #ifndef NO_PTHREADS
>>
>> static pthread_mutex_t read_mutex;
>> #define read_lock() pthread_mutex_lock(&read_mutex)
>> #define read_unlock() pthread_mutex_unlock(&read_mutex)
>>
>> static pthread_mutex_t cache_mutex;
>> #define cache_lock() pthread_mutex_lock(&cache_mutex)
>> #define cache_unlock() pthread_mutex_unlock(&cache_mutex)
>>
>> static pthread_mutex_t progress_mutex;
>> #define progress_lock() pthread_mutex_lock(&progress_mutex)
>> #define progress_unlock() pthread_mutex_unlock(&progress_mutex)
>>
>> #else
>>
>> #define read_lock() (void)0
>> #define read_unlock() (void)0
>> #define cache_lock() (void)0
>> #define cache_unlock() (void)0
>> #define progress_lock() (void)0
>> #define progress_unlock() (void)0
>>
>> #endif
>>
>> Is it possible the MinGW version of git is compiled with NO_PTHREADS
>> #defined? If so, it would mean there's no locking being done at all and
>> would explain the faster execution and near 100% CPU utilization when
>> running under MinGW.
>
> Nah, there is no threading enabled when there is no pthreads. How
> would that work? :D See thread-utils.h
>
> #ifndef NO_PTHREADS
> #include <pthread.h>
>
> extern int online_cpus(void);
> extern int init_recursive_mutex(pthread_mutex_t*);
>
> #else
>
> #define online_cpus() 1
>
> #endif
We're not familiar at all with MinGW. Could you locate the source for
MinGW's pthread_mutex_lock() online and give us a link to it? And BTW,
which Windows are you running and on what kind of hardware (bitness and
#CPUS/threads)?
It looks like we're going to have to compare actual pthread_mutex_lock()
implementations. Inspecting source is nice but I don't want to be
chasing a mirage so I really hope there's a pthread_mutex_lock()
function inside the MinGW git you are running. gdb could easily answer
that question. Could you please do an 'info func pthread_mutex_lock'
after starting MinGW git under MinGW gdb with a breakpoint at main() (so
libraries are loaded).
..mark
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list